Carbon dating for

But, carbon dating can't be used to date either rocks or fossils.

It is only useful for once-living things which still contain carbon, like flesh or bone or wood.

Specimens would then look much older than they actually are.

carbon dating for-89carbon dating for-46

We could put forward the following counter arguments to the constancy of these assumptions: a) The constancy of cosmic ray bombardment might be questioned.

The current high rate of entry might be a consequence of a disturbed post-Flood environment that altered the .

Elements can be transported into a sample or leach out of a sample.

Scientists will reject theories about the age of the earth that do not conform to the norm.

Evolutionists assume that the rate of cosmic bombardment of the atmosphere has always remained constant and that the rate of decay has remained constant.

Scientists place great faith in this dating method, and yet more than 50% of radiocarbon dates from geological and archaeological samples of northeastern North America have been deemed unacceptable after investigation.Help us reduce the maintenance cost of our online services.Because your computer is running an older version of internet browser, it no longer meets the features of modern websites.For more on this subject, see the video Bones in Stones i. Ogden III, "Annals of the New York Academy of Science," 288 (1977): 167-173. Perhaps no concept in science is as misunderstood as "carbon dating." Almost everyone thinks carbon dating speaks of millions or billions of years.While there is no proof that the rates were different in the past than they are today, there is also no proof that they were the same.

Tags: , ,