coh tov validating media - Reasons for validating scientific reasoning

Some relatively recent philosophers, most notably the logical positivists, have denied that there is a domain of thought or human existence rightly governed by faith, asserting instead that all meaningful statements and ideas are accessible to thorough rational examination.

reasons for validating scientific reasoning-63reasons for validating scientific reasoning-61reasons for validating scientific reasoning-14

This model is thus assumed both by religious fundamentalists, who resolve the rivalry on the side of faith, and scientific naturalists, who resolve it on the side of reason. Here the aims, objects, and methods of reason and faith are understood to be distinct. Reason aims at empirical truth; religion aims at divine truths. This model subdivides further into three subdivisions.

First, one can hold faith is , inasmuch as it is higher than reason.

This latter strategy has been employed by some Christian existentialists.

Reason can only reconstruct what is already implicit in faith or religious practice.

Some kind of algorithmic is ordinarily presupposed.

Once demonstrated, a proposition or claim is ordinarily understood to be justified as true or authoritative.

As such, it is ordinarily understood to involve an act of will or a commitment on the part of the believer.

Religious faith involves a belief that makes some kind of either an implicit or explicit reference to a transcendent source.

The religious beliefs that are the objects of faith can thus be divided into those what are in fact strictly demonstrable ().

Religious faith is of two kinds: evidence-sensitive and evidence-insensitive.

Second, one can hold that religious belief is , thus not subject to rational evaluation at all.

Tags: , ,